Foreign Shell Company is No Shield in Franchise Dispute

Posted on Blog September 16, 2015


A Florida federal judge has ruled that Hard Rock Cafe International must face a Bahamas-based franchisee’s suit claiming it exaggerated its profitability and demanded exorbitant royalties, finding the court has jurisdiction although the franchise agreement was executed by a foreign Hard Rock affiliate located in the Isle of Jersey, a known tax haven. Although the foreign affiliate might have an interest in the U.S. litigation, it is no shield to litigation in our courts because the ability to protect that interest is not impaired or impeded by its absence from the case. In other words, tax shelters do not necessarily prevent franchisees from enforcing their rights against franchisors in federal court.

HRCC Ltd. v. Hard Rock Café Int’l (USA), Inc., et al., M.D. Fla., Case No. 6:14-cv-02004-PGB-KRS.


Contact Us

   ZESB in The News

  • 05/17/2019

    National Jack in the Box Franchisee Association Issues Statement on Management’s Refusal to Address Franchisee Concerns During Q2 Earnings Call Author: Jennifer Webb at Coltrin & Associates
    Publication: Business Wire

    View Article //

  • 04/25/2019

    BURGER KING DISMISSES ITS SUIT AGAINST A LARGE FRANCHISEE The 37 locations in Southern Texas owned by Guillermo Perales will remain open. Author: Jonathan Maze
    Publication: Restaurant Business

    View Article //

   Firm News